Trends in anti-bribery laws

Filed under - Politics and government

Published on 7 March 2012 as a TI Helpdesk answer
Which countries have passed anti-bribery legislation recently, what are their key features, and what global trends do we detect in such legislation?

Note

This answer is also available in French.

Content

  1. Examples of countries that have recently passed anti-bribery legislation
  2. Global trends in new anti-bribery legislation

Summary

Among other things, international conventions such as the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention and the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC), require signatory-countries to criminalise foreign bribery and cooperate with other countries during investigations. These conventions have played a major role in triggering and guiding recent domestic reforms, as the great majority of countries which have recently approved new anti-bribery regulation have done so to comply with the requirements of such conventions.

These countries include countries long regarded as having a corrupt business environment, such as Russia and China. Other countries such as Chile, Ireland, Israel, Luxembourg, Peru, the Slovak Republic, Spain, Turkey and Ukraine have also adopted new bribery related regulations in the past two years, while Brazil, India and Indonesia are currently discussing proposals to improve their anticorruption legal framework.

The criminalisation of foreign bribery is among the most important trends that can be detected in these new regulations, with the majority of countries either criminalising foreign bribery (e.g.: China, Russia, Chile), or clarifying the scope of existing laws (e.g. Spain, Ireland, Israel). The issue of corporate liability also emerges as a trend, with a significant number of countries introducing criminal liability for legal entities (e.g.: Luxembourg, Slovak), and one country introducing (only) administrative liability for legal entities (Russia). Last but not least, several countries have adopted stronger penalties for bribery of both domestic and foreign public officials. Other changes include the criminalisation of commercial bribery (Ukraine/Russia), whistleblower protection (Ireland/Turkey), and the extension of the prescription period (Spain).

Author(s): Maíra Martini, Transparency International, [email protected]
Reviewed by: Marie Chêne, Transparency International, [email protected] Robin Hodess, Transparency International, [email protected]
Publication date: 7 March 2012
Number: 24

Download full answer

Country / Territory - Brazil   |   Chile   |   China   |   India   |   Indonesia   |   Ireland   |   Luxembourg   |   Peru   |   Russia   |   Slovakia   |   Spain   |   Turkey   |   Ukraine   
Region - Americas   |   Asia Pacific   |   Europe and Central Asia   
Topic - Conventions   |   Politics and government   |   Whistleblowing   
Tags - Anti-bribery   |   Reform   |   OECD Anti-Bribery Convention   |   Anti-corruption legislation   |   UN Convention against Corruption   |   Trends   |   Legal frameworks   

Contact the Anti-Corruption Helpdesk

If you work for one of our supporting partner organisations, submit your query to the Helpdesk:
[email protected]

More Helpdesk answers

06
May
2016

What are the linkages between corruption and commodity trading? Please provide a brief overview of the state of knowledge including on the mechanisms ...

08
Apr
2014

Could you provide an overview of corruption-related issues in the telecommunications sector, with a focus on SADC countries?

Transparency Twitter