No Death Penalty for Corruption

Issued by Transparency International Kenya



Nairobi, Kenya: 1st April, 2014 - Transparency International Kenya strongly opposes the effort by Kiharu MP, Irungu Kang’ata to amend Section 48 of the Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act to impose the death penalty on those who are found guilty of corruption. While we appreciate the zeal of the MP, we find it misdirected and diversionary.

Our position is informed by two reasons. First, the imposition of the death penalty for any offence has been a divisive issue in Kenya. Even though the death penalty is still in our statute books, there is very strong sentiment against it. So strong are these sentiments that despite the legality of the death penalty in our laws, no one has been executed for any offence in Kenya since 1984. There exists an effective moratorium on executions that tilts the balance in favour of those against the death penalty in Kenya.

Secondly, the debate on the death penalty unnecessarily diverts attention from the important work of strengthening our justice system to ensure there are no gaps that the corrupt use to escape justice. So far, the frustration of many Kenyans is that there are very few people who are being held to account successfully through the legal system. The effectiveness of any legal system is founded not on the extremity of the sanctions thereof, but on the consistency of enforcement. There is very little utility in allowing for extreme sanctions even if the seemingly lenient ones are hardly delivered. The sanctions for corruption in our statute books if stringently enforced, coupled with upholding the principle of equality before the law are sufficient in helping Kenya succeed in fighting corruption.

We thank and welcome Hon. Irungu Kang’ata’s concern to strengthen the legislative framework for the fight against corruption but disagree that we should pursue the death penalty for offenders at all. We urge him to drop the quest and invite him for a discussion on how the fight against corruption in Kenya should be strengthened.

Samuel Kimeu Executive Director


For any press enquiries please contact

Collins Baswony, Communication Officer
T: +254 20 2730324/5 or via email
E: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Solicitude

Support Transparency International

La Justicia española debe investigar el lavado de imagen de Azerbaiyán en Europa

Tres políticos españoles —Pedro Agramunt, Agustín Conde Bajén y Jordi Xuclá— se encuentran entre los delegados ante la Asamblea Parlamentaria del Consejo de Europa (APCE) sobre los que pesan sospechas de haberse beneficiado con la maniobra del “Laundromat”.

International Anti-Corruption Day 2018: The power of people’s pressure

Across the world, Transparency International chapters work hard to help the public become involved and engaged in the fight against corruption.

Clean up Spain – Justice for Azerbaijan’s reputation laundering in Europe

In Azerbaijan, critical voices are routinely suppressed. Meanwhile in Europe, politicians suspected of helping whitewash Azerbaijan’s record on human rights enjoy impunity. Join our campaign to urge authorities in Spain to investigate.

Everything you need to know about the 18th International Anti-Corruption Conference (#18IACC)

The #18IACC will take place from 22-24 October in Copenhagen, Denmark under the theme Together for Development, Peace and Security: Now is the Time to Act. Get the latest info and updates here!

Risky business: Europe’s golden visa programmes

Are EU Member States accepting too much risk in their investor migration schemes?

Future Against Corruption Award 2018

TI is calling on young people across the globe to join the anti-corruption movement. People between the age of 18 and 35 are invited to submit a short video clip presenting their idea on new ways to fight corruption. Three finalists will be invited to Berlin during the International Anti-Corruption Day festivities to be awarded with the Future Against Corruption Award.

The Azerbaijani Laundromat one year on: has justice been served?

In September last year, a massive leak of bank records from 2012 to 2014 showed that the ruling elite of Azerbaijan ran a $3 billion slush fund and an international money laundering scheme. One year on, has enough been done to hold those involved to account?

Why rather

Follow us on Why rather