Malaysian Political Parties Have no Views on Curbing Corruption?

Most Malaysian parties, including the main component parties in the ruling coalition, have made no commitment to promote greater transparency and accountability

Issued by Transparency International Secretariat



With the general election approaching, The Kuala Lumpur Society for Transparency & Integrity (the Malaysian Chapter of Transparency International) recently concluded a poll of 19 registered political parties to gauge their stand on combating corruption.

Although every effort was taken to remind and encourage all political parties contacted to respond to the poll, including extending the deadline, only four parties replied, clearly stating their positions on issues of transparency and accountability through 'Yes' and 'No' answers (see the summary of results). Of the four parties to respond, PAS (Islamic Party of Malaysia) and Parti Keadilan National (National Justice Party) scored full points, answering 'Yes' to all 28 questions. Next highest score of 27 'Yes' answers went to PRM (Malaysian People's Party) which answered 'Yes' to every question except 3e ("Do you support elections to municipal councils along non-party political lines?"). DAP (Democratic Action Party) also answered 'No' to 3e and failed to commit an answer to 3f ("Will you initiate legislation imposing a maximum of two [five-year] terms for the Prime Minister?") and 5c ("Are you in favour of a public referendum before any major constitutional amendment?").

It has been assumed that the remaining 15 parties - including the main component parties of the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition - either have no views on curbing corruption or are non-committal to the issues raised in the poll as their failure to respond suggests. Both PAS and Parti Keadilan National will receive The Society's "Transparency & Integrity Certificate of Honour" for supporting moves to promote transparency and accountability.


For any press enquiries please contact

Please contact The Kuala Lumpur Society for Transparency and Integrity
Tunku Abdul Aziz or Mr. Jeffrey Tan at
Phone: +603-41 49 4596
Fax: +603-41 49 4596
E-Mail: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Solicitude

Support Transparency International

Risky business: Europe’s golden visa programmes

Are EU Member States accepting too much risk in their investor migration schemes?

Future Against Corruption Award 2018

TI is calling on young people across the globe to join the anti-corruption movement. People between the age of 18 and 35 are invited to submit a short video clip presenting their idea on new ways to fight corruption. Three finalists will be invited to Berlin during the International Anti-Corruption Day festivities to be awarded with the Future Against Corruption Award. Apply today!

The Azerbaijani Laundromat one year on: has justice been served?

In September last year, a massive leak of bank records from 2012 to 2014 showed that the ruling elite of Azerbaijan ran a $3 billion slush fund and an international money laundering scheme. One year on, has enough been done to hold those involved to account?

Right to information: knowledge is power

The right to information is vital for preventing corruption. When citizens can access key facts and data from governments, it is more difficult to hide abuses of power and other illegal activities - governments can be held accountable.

Paradise lost among Maldives dodgy land deals

Should tourists run for cover as a storm of corruption allegations sweeps across the Maldives?

Foreign bribery rages unchecked in over half of global trade

There are many losers and few winners when companies bribe foreign public officials to win lucrative overseas contracts. In prioritising profits over principles, governments in most major exporting countries fail to prosecute companies flouting laws criminalising foreign bribery.

Ensuring that climate funds reach those in need

As climate change creates huge ecological and economic damage, more and more money is being given to at-risk countries to help them prevent it and adapt to its effects. But poorly governed climate finance can be diverted into private bank accounts and vanity projects, often leading to damaging effects.

Why rather

Follow us on Why rather