Afghanistan: Government must deal with corruption to build democracy and peace

Landmark assessment of corruption risks finds systematic nepotism, a lack of integrity among politicians and impunity for the powerful.

Issued by Transparency International Secretariat

The government of Afghanistan can only ensure the survival of the state and bring about peace if it acts immediately to prevent corruption, limit political interference and nepotism, and bring the corrupt to justice, according to a new report from Transparency International and national partner Integrity Watch Afghanistan.

Providing the first-ever comprehensive assessment of Afghanistan’s capacity to fight corruption, National Integrity System Assessment: Afghanistan 2015 identifies the weaknesses that have undermined the effectiveness of billions of dollars of international funding and contributed to ongoing war in the country. It makes key recommendations to improve Afghanistan’s chances of establishing a viable government with trusted institutions.

“President Ghani has pledged to uproot corruption – this report gives him a road map for action,” said Srirak Plipat, Regional Director for Asia Pacific at Transparency International.
“Afghanistan urgently needs strong and independent institutions, free from political influence, with genuine capacity to prevent and prosecute corruption.”

Despite massive investment, Afghanistan’s public sector is struggling to provide even basic services to citizens thanks to political interference in recruiting and removing staff and a failure to deter corruption and petty bribery, the report found.

“Afghanistan is a country at war, and if the government loses the trust of the people, it will have no chance of winning. Curbing corruption is no longer just a desirable objective; it is a strategic imperative,” said Sayed Ikram Afzali, Executive Director of Integrity Watch Afghanistan, a co-author of the report with Transparency International.

The government’s most urgent move must be to restore the public’s trust in the state’s ability to deliver justice. Less than half of victims who report incidents of violence or crime, report them to the police. The courts are also not seen as independent and those in power enjoy impunity.

With no independent oversight body, the judiciary is heavily influenced by politicians and elites. Even in the rare cases where the corrupt are convicted and sentenced, punishments are not always upheld in practice. The government’s recent attempt to sign a multi-million dollar real estate deal with a businessman currently imprisoned for his role in the Kabul Bank scandal is just one example of widespread abuse of power.

Members of parliament have physically assaulted police officers without any serious repercussions, and there are allegations of parliamentarians voting in support of ministers facing votes of no-confidence in return for money or favours.

Aggravating matters further, Afghanistan’s anti-corruption agency is not fulfilling its mandate to hold politicians and officials to account. Despite claiming to have registered the assets of 8,000 officials, the report found that as of 2012 only 66 had been published.  

Nevertheless where the political will for reform exists, change is possible. The government’s newly-established National Procurement Agency, for example, marks an important step in ensuring public money is protected through external oversight. The next step will be to ensure the public is also able to oversee spending with open access to contract data.

Transparency International and Integrity Watch Afghanistan call on President Ghani to take further steps to curb corruption immediately:

And further:

For any press enquiries please contact

Kabul, Afghanistan
T: +93 (0) 780 942 942
E: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Berlin, Germany

T: +49 30 343820 666
E: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)


Support Transparency International

The alarming message of Egypt’s constitutional amendments

Parliamentarians in Egypt look set to approve a series of constitutional amendments this week that, if passed, would consolidate power in the office of the president, while restoring the military as the ultimate authority in the country.

Восточная Европа и Центральная Азия: слабая система сдержек и противовесов

Индекс восприятия коррупции (ИВК) за этот год представляет печальную картину касательно мер по борьбе с коррупцией в Восточной Европе и Центральной Азии. За несколько лет в этом регионе был достигнут очень незначительный прогресс в борьбе с коррупцией.

الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا: انتشار الفساد في ظل ضعف المؤسسات وتراجع الحقوق السياسية

كشف مؤشر مدركات الفساد 2018 عن صورة قاتمة لواقع الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا حيث أن معظم بلدان المنطقة قد أخفقت في مكافحة الفساد على الرغم من أن قلة قليلة من البلدان قد أحرزت تقدما تدريجيا.

Afrique subsaharienne:Les régimes non démocratiques sapent les efforts de lutte contre la corruption

L’Indice de perception de la corruption (IPC) présente cette année un tableau bien sombre de l’Afrique : seuls 8 pays sur 49 obtiennent un score supérieur à 43 sur les 100 points que compte l’Indice. Malgré l’engagement pris par les dirigeants africains de faire de 2018 l’Année africaine de lutte contre la corruption, les avancées concrètes se font encore attendre.

Trouble at the top: why high-scoring countries aren’t corruption-free

For the third year running, the top seven countries in the Corruption Perceptions Index 2018 consist of the four Nordic nations – Denmark, Finland, Sweden and Norway – plus New Zealand, Singapore and Switzerland. Yet that doesn’t mean that these countries are corruption-free.

Americas: el debilitamiento de la democracia y el auge del populismo

Con una puntuación media de 44 sobre 100 durante tres años consecutivos en el Índice de Percepción de la Corrupción (IPC), las Américas continúa sin lograr avances significativos en la lucha contra la corrupción.

Conflict at the bottom

As in previous years, many of the countries near the bottom of the 2018 Corruption Perceptions Index have been severely affected by violent conflict in recent years. Why is this the case, and what does it tell us?

Why rather

Follow us on Why rather