Opposing the UNESCO-Obiang International Prize for Research in the Life Sciences

Issued by Transparency International Secretariat



On March 8 the UNCAC Coalition, a global network of over 310 civil society organisations in 100 countries, sent a letter to the Chairperson of the Executive Board of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO), Alissandra Cummins, opposing the establishment of the Obiang Nguema Mbasogo International Prize for Research in the Life Sciences. Here is the letter:

Opposing the UNESCO-Obiang International Prize for Research in the Life Sciences

Honourable Ms. Cummins,

The UNCAC Coalition, composed of more than 300 civil society organisations committed to fighting corruption and promoting human rights worldwide, has learned that UNESCO’s Executive Board, will take a decision this week at its 189th session, regarding the UNESCO – Obiang Nguema Mbasogo International Prize for Research in the Life Sciences. The prize was created in 2008 but suspended twice by the Executive Board following a public outcry. Now the Executive Board is considering the matter again.

The UNCAC Coalition strongly opposes the establishment of this award, funded from the public treasury of Equatorial Guinea and yet named after its long-term head of state. As we already communicated in 2010, we believe that the award and its endorsement of Mr. Obiang are fundamentally contrary to the spirit and principles of the United Nations, as well as to UNESCO’s constitutional goals. President Obiang heads a country that has been ranked by Transparency International as among the most corrupt in the world, whose government is known for well-documented brutality and whose citizens live in poverty despite the country’s oil riches. In more than 30 years of government, Mr. Obiang has missed the opportunity to use oil revenues, and other sources of government income, to improve the life of the people in Equatorial Guinea or even to make transparent what those revenues are.

With the assistance of civil society groups, law enforcement proceedings have been initiated in France, Spain and the USA to investigate President Obiang and other senior Equatoguinean officials including his son Teodorin Obiang for alleged illicit enrichment and embezzlement of public funds. These proceedings have so far resulted in the seizure of millions of dollars-worth of luxury automobiles, goods and furniture.

While the international community has committed to fighting corruption and impunity worldwide within the framework of the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC), President Teodoro Obiang is attempting to use and abuse UNESCO to burnish his regime’s image through the Obiang prize.

The UNCAC Coalition believes that by allowing this prize, UNESCO would send the wrong message, providing positive publicity to an individual and a regime about which there are grave concerns on many counts. Therefore, we respectfully call upon the United Nations and UNESCO to take the necessary steps to:

1. Make a final decision to cancel the UNESCO-Obiang Prize at the 189th session of UNESCO’s Executive Board and to reject any other Obiang-endowed prize.

2. Set up clear, transparent guidelines for the creation of awards by the UN and UN agencies, in order to guarantee that all awards and their funding sources are in full accord with UN essential values, international commitments and standards regarding the promotion of human rights, the Millennium Development Goals and the global fight against corruption.

We would be very grateful for your support on this matter and look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Slagjana Taseva

Chair, UNCAC Coalition

Contact: [email protected]; Tel: + 49 30 3438 2017

Ms Alissandra Cummins

Chairperson of the Executive Board

cc: Members of the Executive Board

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation


For any press enquiries please contact

Slagjana Taseva, Chair
UNCAC Coalition
T: + 49 30 3438 2017
E: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Solicitude

Support Transparency International

La Justicia española debe investigar el lavado de imagen de Azerbaiyán en Europa

Tres políticos españoles —Pedro Agramunt, Agustín Conde Bajén y Jordi Xuclá— se encuentran entre los delegados ante la Asamblea Parlamentaria del Consejo de Europa (APCE) sobre los que pesan sospechas de haberse beneficiado con la maniobra del “Laundromat”.

International Anti-Corruption Day 2018: The power of people’s pressure

Across the world, Transparency International chapters work hard to help the public become involved and engaged in the fight against corruption.

Clean up Spain – Justice for Azerbaijan’s reputation laundering in Europe

In Azerbaijan, critical voices are routinely suppressed. Meanwhile in Europe, politicians suspected of helping whitewash Azerbaijan’s record on human rights enjoy impunity. Join our campaign to urge authorities in Spain to investigate.

Everything you need to know about the 18th International Anti-Corruption Conference (#18IACC)

The #18IACC will take place from 22-24 October in Copenhagen, Denmark under the theme Together for Development, Peace and Security: Now is the Time to Act. Get the latest info and updates here!

Risky business: Europe’s golden visa programmes

Are EU Member States accepting too much risk in their investor migration schemes?

Future Against Corruption Award 2018

TI is calling on young people across the globe to join the anti-corruption movement. People between the age of 18 and 35 are invited to submit a short video clip presenting their idea on new ways to fight corruption. Three finalists will be invited to Berlin during the International Anti-Corruption Day festivities to be awarded with the Future Against Corruption Award.

The Azerbaijani Laundromat one year on: has justice been served?

In September last year, a massive leak of bank records from 2012 to 2014 showed that the ruling elite of Azerbaijan ran a $3 billion slush fund and an international money laundering scheme. One year on, has enough been done to hold those involved to account?

Why rather

Follow us on Why rather