UN Anti-Corruption Convention at a crossroads

UN Anti-Corruption Convention at a crossroads

Governments need to work more closely with civil society

The fight against corruption requires tough laws, consistent implementation and a pact with citizens that they and their leaders are in this together. That is what was behind the creation of which was introduced in 2003, a legal framework for legislating against corruption.

Twelve years on though progress has been made more is needed. 177 countries have signed the binding treaty and there are hundreds of laws on the books; it’s now a matter of turning words into concrete actions.

This week Transparency International is in St. Petersburg, Russia at the where the governments that have signed the UNCAC are meeting to take stock. We are calling on the delegates to both strengthen the convention and commit to greater participation and protection for civil society. Countries are getting off too lightly when they don’t comply and too often civil society critics are silenced.

For the first time there will be a public discussion at the conference of the role of civil society in implementing the UNCAC and, more specifically of the role of civil society in UNCAC processes. Transparency International has submitted recommendations – click here to read them all – to turn the rhetoric of citizen participation into a reality.

The most important recommendation is to create safe and effective conditions for the involvement of civil society. Too many governments, including those who are at the conference and the host Russia are restricting what civil society can do in their countries.

What is UNCAC?

  • UNCAC provides the legal framework for its signatories – there are now 177 – to legislate against corruption.
  • Since the last Conference of State Parties in 2013 Germany and the Czech Republic have joined the club but G20 member Japan and New Zealand are still hold-outs.
  • Article 13 of the convention explicitly recognises the role of civil society participation.
  • UNCAC has a review process to check if countries are introducing and enforcing laws to fight corruption, but it currently lacks a follow-up to the recommendations.

Grand Corruption

Grand corruption is a type of corruption that is in a category of its own and needs special measures and sanctions. We define it as the abuse of high-level power that benefits the few at the expense of the many and causes widespread harm to individuals and society. It often goes unpunished.

The UNCAC conference needs to agree on strong action to address this kind of corruption: when the whole of government acts like a criminal organisation and funnels public goods into the hands of the few. We saw that in Peru with . The stolen assets by dictators such as Ben Ali in Tunisia are another example.

Grand Corruption is an obstacle to sustainable development and targets the most vulnerable. We have a series of recommendations we will be delivering that aim to strengthen the fight against grand corruption including:

The

The is a group of more than 300 civil society organisations with Transparency International providing the secretariat. It has created a voluntary Transparency Pledge to build support for good practices among governments. We’ll be asking the delegates in St. Petersburg to sign up:

The six principles for better cooperation between civil society and governments are:

  • We will publish updated review schedules for our country review
  • We will share information about the review institution with civil society
  • We will announce the completion of the country review indicating where the report can be found
  • We will promptly post online the self-assessment and the full country report in a UN language, together with the executive summary in local languages
  • We will organise civil society briefings and public debates about the findings of the report
  • We will publicly support participation of civil society observers in UNCAC subsidiary bodies

For any press enquiries please contact [email protected]

Solicitude

Support Transparency International

Risky business: Europe’s golden visa programmes

Are EU Member States accepting too much risk in their investor migration schemes?

Future Against Corruption Award 2018

TI is calling on young people across the globe to join the anti-corruption movement. People between the age of 18 and 35 are invited to submit a short video clip presenting their idea on new ways to fight corruption. Three finalists will be invited to Berlin during the International Anti-Corruption Day festivities to be awarded with the Future Against Corruption Award. Apply today!

The Azerbaijani Laundromat one year on: has justice been served?

In September last year, a massive leak of bank records from 2012 to 2014 showed that the ruling elite of Azerbaijan ran a $3 billion slush fund and an international money laundering scheme. One year on, has enough been done to hold those involved to account?

Right to information: knowledge is power

The right to information is vital for preventing corruption. When citizens can access key facts and data from governments, it is more difficult to hide abuses of power and other illegal activities - governments can be held accountable.

Paradise lost among Maldives dodgy land deals

Should tourists run for cover as a storm of corruption allegations sweeps across the Maldives?

Foreign bribery rages unchecked in over half of global trade

There are many losers and few winners when companies bribe foreign public officials to win lucrative overseas contracts. In prioritising profits over principles, governments in most major exporting countries fail to prosecute companies flouting laws criminalising foreign bribery.

Ensuring that climate funds reach those in need

As climate change creates huge ecological and economic damage, more and more money is being given to at-risk countries to help them prevent it and adapt to its effects. But poorly governed climate finance can be diverted into private bank accounts and vanity projects, often leading to damaging effects.

Why rather

Follow us on Why rather