UN Anti-Corruption Convention at a crossroads

UN Anti-Corruption Convention at a crossroads

Governments need to work more closely with civil society

The fight against corruption requires tough laws, consistent implementation and a pact with citizens that they and their leaders are in this together. That is what was behind the creation of which was introduced in 2003, a legal framework for legislating against corruption.

Twelve years on though progress has been made more is needed. 177 countries have signed the binding treaty and there are hundreds of laws on the books; it’s now a matter of turning words into concrete actions.

This week Transparency International is in St. Petersburg, Russia at the where the governments that have signed the UNCAC are meeting to take stock. We are calling on the delegates to both strengthen the convention and commit to greater participation and protection for civil society. Countries are getting off too lightly when they don’t comply and too often civil society critics are silenced.

For the first time there will be a public discussion at the conference of the role of civil society in implementing the UNCAC and, more specifically of the role of civil society in UNCAC processes. Transparency International has submitted recommendations – click here to read them all – to turn the rhetoric of citizen participation into a reality.

The most important recommendation is to create safe and effective conditions for the involvement of civil society. Too many governments, including those who are at the conference and the host Russia are restricting what civil society can do in their countries.

What is UNCAC?

  • UNCAC provides the legal framework for its signatories – there are now 177 – to legislate against corruption.
  • Since the last Conference of State Parties in 2013 Germany and the Czech Republic have joined the club but G20 member Japan and New Zealand are still hold-outs.
  • Article 13 of the convention explicitly recognises the role of civil society participation.
  • UNCAC has a review process to check if countries are introducing and enforcing laws to fight corruption, but it currently lacks a follow-up to the recommendations.

Grand Corruption

Grand corruption is a type of corruption that is in a category of its own and needs special measures and sanctions. We define it as the abuse of high-level power that benefits the few at the expense of the many and causes widespread harm to individuals and society. It often goes unpunished.

The UNCAC conference needs to agree on strong action to address this kind of corruption: when the whole of government acts like a criminal organisation and funnels public goods into the hands of the few. We saw that in Peru with . The stolen assets by dictators such as Ben Ali in Tunisia are another example.

Grand Corruption is an obstacle to sustainable development and targets the most vulnerable. We have a series of recommendations we will be delivering that aim to strengthen the fight against grand corruption including:


The is a group of more than 300 civil society organisations with Transparency International providing the secretariat. It has created a voluntary Transparency Pledge to build support for good practices among governments. We’ll be asking the delegates in St. Petersburg to sign up:

The six principles for better cooperation between civil society and governments are:

  • We will publish updated review schedules for our country review
  • We will share information about the review institution with civil society
  • We will announce the completion of the country review indicating where the report can be found
  • We will promptly post online the self-assessment and the full country report in a UN language, together with the executive summary in local languages
  • We will organise civil society briefings and public debates about the findings of the report
  • We will publicly support participation of civil society observers in UNCAC subsidiary bodies

For any press enquiries please contact [email protected]


Support Transparency International

The alarming message of Egypt’s constitutional amendments

Parliamentarians in Egypt look set to approve a series of constitutional amendments this week that, if passed, would consolidate power in the office of the president, while restoring the military as the ultimate authority in the country.

Восточная Европа и Центральная Азия: слабая система сдержек и противовесов

Индекс восприятия коррупции (ИВК) за этот год представляет печальную картину касательно мер по борьбе с коррупцией в Восточной Европе и Центральной Азии. За несколько лет в этом регионе был достигнут очень незначительный прогресс в борьбе с коррупцией.

الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا: انتشار الفساد في ظل ضعف المؤسسات وتراجع الحقوق السياسية

كشف مؤشر مدركات الفساد 2018 عن صورة قاتمة لواقع الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا حيث أن معظم بلدان المنطقة قد أخفقت في مكافحة الفساد على الرغم من أن قلة قليلة من البلدان قد أحرزت تقدما تدريجيا.

Afrique subsaharienne:Les régimes non démocratiques sapent les efforts de lutte contre la corruption

L’Indice de perception de la corruption (IPC) présente cette année un tableau bien sombre de l’Afrique : seuls 8 pays sur 49 obtiennent un score supérieur à 43 sur les 100 points que compte l’Indice. Malgré l’engagement pris par les dirigeants africains de faire de 2018 l’Année africaine de lutte contre la corruption, les avancées concrètes se font encore attendre.

Trouble at the top: why high-scoring countries aren’t corruption-free

For the third year running, the top seven countries in the Corruption Perceptions Index 2018 consist of the four Nordic nations – Denmark, Finland, Sweden and Norway – plus New Zealand, Singapore and Switzerland. Yet that doesn’t mean that these countries are corruption-free.

Americas: el debilitamiento de la democracia y el auge del populismo

Con una puntuación media de 44 sobre 100 durante tres años consecutivos en el Índice de Percepción de la Corrupción (IPC), las Américas continúa sin lograr avances significativos en la lucha contra la corrupción.

Conflict at the bottom

As in previous years, many of the countries near the bottom of the 2018 Corruption Perceptions Index have been severely affected by violent conflict in recent years. Why is this the case, and what does it tell us?

Why rather

Follow us on Why rather