Brazil’s World Cup corruption challenge

Brazil’s World Cup corruption challenge

All eyes are on Brazil as the World Cup kicks off on 12 June. Unfortunately, the focus is not just the football. and mismanagement are multiplying as more stories surface about how budgets tripled for the construction of some stadiums and how the companies that won construction contracts donated large sums to political campaigns.

This is bringing people from many parts of Brazil out onto the streets to protest. They want to know how the estimated for the competition was used and misused. They are angry the money did not go to fund schools and healthcare.

Maracaña stadium image
Rio's Maracanã stadium has been
upgraded for the World Cup

They are also angry at FIFA, football’s world governing body that is facing its own regarding the hosting of the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, for exploiting Brazil its government.

The anger is not surprising. Brazilians do not trust their politicians – 81 per cent think political parties are corrupt according to the most recent Transparency International Global Corruption Barometer – and the country still lacks a strong anti-corruption infrastructure.

The good news is that there is progress towards a better anti-corruption framework. It was the new pro-transparency legislation (an Access to Information Law and the Fiscal Responsibility Law) that let citizens and journalists track public expenditures which helped the alleged corruption in World Cup construction projects, for example. But those responsible may in the end escape punishment thanks to a slow justice system and the statute of limitations.

Here’s where Transparency International thinks Brazil is making progress and where it is not, and what we think the government has to do next.

Thumbs up

1. More and better anticorruption and pro-transparency legislation in the past five years

Recent milestones include:

2. Independence and autonomy of the Supreme Court in the “Mensalão” case

When the Supreme Court some of the country’s best-known politicians in a political bribery scandal and sent them to jail it sent a strong message that the judiciary can act independently. The Court proceedings were also televised..

3. Reform of the Federal Police

The restructuring of Brazil’s Federal Police started in 2003 and has resulted in an increasing number of investigations and arrests related to corruption and money laundering. Operation “Own goal”, for example, led to of businessmen and officials for their alleged involvement in misusing credit lines designated for World Cup infrastructure projects. In another high-profile case, a former director of state-run oil and gas giant and other businessmen were arrested for alleged corruption involving the acquisition of an oil refinery in Texas.  

4. Free and active media

The media is a strong force against corruption in Brazil, uncovering a huge number of corruption cases. The media has also government expenditures related to the World Cup as well as corruption and abuses in the construction of stadiums and other infrastructure projects.

5. An increasingly active civil society

Participatory democracy is alive and well in Brazil with a growing and increasingly active number of fighting corruption at all levels in the country. An interesting example of civil society engagement and active coordinated participation can be seen through the project , which monitored World Cup spending.

Thumbs down

1. Lack of regulation and limited enforcement of the Access to Information Law

Although this important piece of legislation is now passed, it needs greater investment in both data infrastructure and enforcement, especially at the state and municipal levels.

Image of Brazil Supreme Court
Brazil's Supreme Court

2. A slow and inefficient judiciary system

One of the major causes of impunity in Brazil comes from the country’s underperforming judiciary. Its limitations range from an obsolete Code of Civil Procedures to a lack of proper penalties for corrupt judges. Excessive opportunities for appeal cause endless prolongation of cases and it can give certain government officials and politicians the prerogative to be judged only by the Supreme Court.      

3. Lack of controls on political campaign financing

In Brazil the rich have a disproportionate amount of power over the political process from local council level to the presidency because there is lax oversight and a weak sanctions regime for breaching the official donation limits. Campaign financing is also a major driver of corruption in the public sector. , at least 50 per cent of the investigations into diversion of public resources reveal that all or part of the money ends up paying for political campaigns

4. Too many appointed positions in the public administration

More than 23,000 government jobs are appointments, meaning that there is no competition. This compares with 5,600 in the US and 4,800 in France. Politicians can nominate supporters or business partners to government jobs, often with ties to campaign donors.   

5. Concentration of media ownership

Although the media enjoys freedom, only six families own the most important media companies in Brazil.

Top five reforms to fight corruption in Brazil

Transparency International and its partner organisation in Brazil, , want to make sure the momentum for greater accountability built up around the World Cup does not disappear after the final whistle is heard. Here are five recommendations for reform:

  • Reform and modernise the judiciary system, with a focus on judicial procedures and putting a stop to immunity and privileges for politicians
  • Introduce a special law to protect whistleblowers
  • Give new powers and resources to the Comptroller’s General Office (Controladoria-Geral da União) to assure the proper implementation and enforcement of the country’s anti-corruption legislation, as well as the sanctioning for non-compliance
  • Limit the number of people who can be appointed to public administration posts to stop cronyism
  • Restrict private company donations to political campaigns and introduce spending caps and full disclosure of donations to the political campaign process, while bringing in oversight that works and sanctions that bite.

For any press enquiries please contact [email protected]merce.info

Solicitude

Support Transparency International

Risky business: Europe’s golden visa programmes

Are EU Member States accepting too much risk in their investor migration schemes?

Future Against Corruption Award 2018

TI is calling on young people across the globe to join the anti-corruption movement. People between the age of 18 and 35 are invited to submit a short video clip presenting their idea on new ways to fight corruption. Three finalists will be invited to Berlin during the International Anti-Corruption Day festivities to be awarded with the Future Against Corruption Award. Apply today!

The Azerbaijani Laundromat one year on: has justice been served?

In September last year, a massive leak of bank records from 2012 to 2014 showed that the ruling elite of Azerbaijan ran a $3 billion slush fund and an international money laundering scheme. One year on, has enough been done to hold those involved to account?

Right to information: knowledge is power

The right to information is vital for preventing corruption. When citizens can access key facts and data from governments, it is more difficult to hide abuses of power and other illegal activities - governments can be held accountable.

Paradise lost among Maldives dodgy land deals

Should tourists run for cover as a storm of corruption allegations sweeps across the Maldives?

Foreign bribery rages unchecked in over half of global trade

There are many losers and few winners when companies bribe foreign public officials to win lucrative overseas contracts. In prioritising profits over principles, governments in most major exporting countries fail to prosecute companies flouting laws criminalising foreign bribery.

Ensuring that climate funds reach those in need

As climate change creates huge ecological and economic damage, more and more money is being given to at-risk countries to help them prevent it and adapt to its effects. But poorly governed climate finance can be diverted into private bank accounts and vanity projects, often leading to damaging effects.

Why rather

Follow us on Why rather